- Identity() as a separate model-definable function rather than using a single "key" in the form of an object pointer or reference. It would define whether multiple "things" are the "same thing".
- Equals() is different than Identity() because objects being equal is not the same thing as "the thing this object represents" is the same as "the thing that object represents".
- Determining the membership of "object 123" in the "set of all instances of class X" could/should be via an explicit list (along with "says who?", "as of when?", etc) rather than an intrinsic property of that object.
- Class definitions are in the mind of the "viewer" and can be applied to any object. Therefore, one should be able to use a mixture of many ontologies.
- Attributes of objects should be stored independently so that they are available to all "views", "classes", "entity types", EAV tuples, etc, etc.
Tuesday, June 6, 2006
Identity() versus Equals()
To expand on item 5 in my original entry, it seems that object oriented languages need to be extended to support the following notions.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment